| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Scheduled Replication | 29 Oct 2006 22:09 GMT | 1 |
I have a database that I have replicated. The design master resides on a shared network drive of our main location and the replicas reside on network drives of other remote locations. Users have a front-end application that links to the replicas depending on
|
| Is replications the right and sound choice? | 27 Oct 2006 09:13 GMT | 4 |
I currently have a database application whereby I have a common FE for each user but with individual BE's on a server for different teams. At present any changes to the BEs are made via the generic FE and using an FE updater. This works quite well as if there is a new team all I ...
|
| Why would local shares not be visible? | 26 Oct 2006 03:10 GMT | 3 |
What reasons would cause shares not be visible to replication manager, in particular shares defined on the machine where replication manager is running? Brian Scanlon
|
| Finding the design master | 20 Oct 2006 03:11 GMT | 2 |
How do I tell, with a replica, the name of its design master?
|
| Not Enough Memory Error | 14 Oct 2006 21:24 GMT | 2 |
I've recently started receiving an error when synchronizing using the Tools | Replication | Synchronize Now. The error is "There isn't enough memory to perform this operation. Close unneeded programs and try the operation again." After I click the OK button, the Synchronization
|
| Replicating and synchronizing a database | 13 Oct 2006 22:41 GMT | 3 |
Hi I have a database that is split, FE and BE. The BE is located on the server. The FE (about 15) are located on laptops that are out of the office durring the day and then connected to the LAN in the office at night. We would like
|
| Indirect Sync A97 - Replication Manager | 11 Oct 2006 00:16 GMT | 39 |
Is it true that Microsoft has now made the files necessary to implement indirect synchronization for A97 public? Does that mean it is no longer necessary to purchase a copy of a Developer's version to legally implement A97 indirect replication? I assume the combination
|
| TSI Synchronizer Error | 11 Oct 2006 00:02 GMT | 6 |
I have the TSI Synchronizer installed on two different machines at home and have been trying to configure them to perform an indirect synchronization. I installed the jet synchronizer which I downloaded from microsoft. I forget what they call the service pack but the file I ended ...
|
| Updating FE of Replicated Database? | 06 Oct 2006 20:22 GMT | 10 |
I inherited a replicated database. I'm new to replication and am confused with many of the things I am hearing from employees and the conflict from what I read on Forums. The idea is always presented that tables (BE) should all be stored in one
|
| Replication Scenario | 05 Oct 2006 17:33 GMT | 1 |
I have a front end/back end database that needs to be used/updated at three locations, none of which can access each electronically. I need to ensure that the changes in all three locations plus changes made to the master at my location are in sync.
|
| Replication Manager | 05 Oct 2006 17:28 GMT | 6 |
Can anyone tell me if replication manager in the 97 developer tools can manage replication for Access 2003 databases?
|
| Schaltfläche zum Daten synchronisieren? | 05 Oct 2006 03:27 GMT | 1 |
Hallo FOrum, ich habe eine Access Datenbank mit Kundendaten auf dem PC im Büro und auf dem Notebook. Um die Daten zu synchronisieren, verwende ich die die Funktion über
|
| How to make a replica not a replica | 05 Oct 2006 01:56 GMT | 6 |
Anyone know how to do this? Short of manually editing every database object to make it not replicable? I have inherited a database that was using replication for no reason, a simple split design with the back end on a file server will work fine. So I want retain all the objects,
|
| Manually editing the conflict table | 04 Oct 2006 20:47 GMT | 3 |
I am trying to get rid of a conflict error that won't go away. Forgive my noviceness but how do I find the conflict table? I'm using Jet 4.0, Microsoft Access 2000 Ver 9.0 Build 6620 SP 3. Also, is it ok to just delete records in the conflict table? I have already
|
| Subject: Replica fails to synchronize, Search key not found, 3709 | 04 Oct 2006 00:01 GMT | 8 |
I've got an Access 2000 format database that has been working well for several years. It's been replicated to two other users. Today I tried to synchronize the Master to one Replica and got this message: "The search key was not found in any record."
|