| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Removing system fields in backup database | 20 Sep 2004 21:16 GMT | 4 |
Hi NG, I want to backup a replicated backend database. Everything works fine, I have all tables (not the system tables) with data and the relations in my backup db. The tables are all unreplicated as expected. But I can?t get
|
| Create your own synchronisation | 20 Sep 2004 08:44 GMT | 4 |
I've been thinking of creating my own synchronisation using guids as autonumbers. If I can implement this then people could email their backends to me and there would be no problem. Has anyone tried this, and are there any things to look out for?
|
| Replication with ISDN just doesn't work! | 13 Sep 2004 08:39 GMT | 2 |
I have set up a replica set with Replication Manager that allows for indirect replication. This works fine within the LAN network. However, when external users dial in to the network via ISDN, indirect replication just doesn't
|
| "No conflict tables" even when sync conflicts exist | 13 Sep 2004 08:30 GMT | 5 |
I am using Access 2000 (SP3). The Design Master and all replicas of my database were synced. On opening the Design Master, I received the typical "conflicts" message: This member of the replica set has conflicts from synchronizing changes
|
| Mistake in Design Master - can replica take precedence? | 13 Sep 2004 08:29 GMT | 1 |
I updated the incorrect field in mt Design Master, but the correct information is still on my replica database - when I synchronize, can I have the replica information take precedence? Otherwise I'm cooked and have no way to
|
| Installing Trigeminal TSI Unrep90.dll in WinXP Pro | 08 Sep 2004 22:08 GMT | 1 |
I am trying to install the Trigeminal Utility that removes the Replication Properties from a Access 2000 Replica. The Instructions include "This is an Add-In, you must register it using regsvr32.exe".
|
| Am I on the right track here? | 08 Sep 2004 16:11 GMT | 2 |
I have an Access 2002 database on a Windows 2000 server at my home office. At two remote offices I want at least 2 people at EACH of those offices to have access to that database. (Potential for 4-6 users updating and synchronizing). Every user is running Windows XP Pro and Office ...
|
| Replication Mgr. causing shutdown? | 07 Sep 2004 22:39 GMT | 1 |
We have some serious problems with our application server where we put the hub master(s) for our replica set. Even though we checked the setup, downloaded all available patches and checked it on viruses, it appears it
|
| frontend and backend with replica | 07 Sep 2004 22:31 GMT | 1 |
I created a single db, now I have been suggested to create a frontend and a backend. I don't know if I understand properly the meaning. First, does it means that I have 2 database? The backend contains only the tables, the frontend all the other objects
|
| Synchronization Error | 07 Sep 2004 22:02 GMT | 6 |
Our nine-member replica set has been working great for a few months, but one of the members will no longer successfully synch. Viewing its synch history, details states "An error occurred while using the partner member
|
| Synchronizer with Indirect Sync Question | 07 Sep 2004 15:33 GMT | 4 |
I am looking at replicating a database for use by connected and disconnected users. I plan on using indirect synchronization but have a couple of questions. 1) Does the synchronizer need to be up and running at all times on each
|
| can i use replication for this situation? | 06 Sep 2004 07:24 GMT | 3 |
I created a DB (linked tables, queries, forms, masks), and I was wondering if the replication is good for the following situation: There are 2 computers (a laptop and a tower pc) 1-some data are entered on a laptop
|
| IE - Clear Content Advisor Password | 05 Sep 2004 22:25 GMT | 1 |
I have a question and cannot seem to get an answer from Microsoft. I am a concerned parent who placed parental control on IE. I have spaced out my password and would like to know if I can clear the password through the BIOS or system tools. The MS tech support refers me to a tech ...
|
| It can't possibly be this easy! | 04 Sep 2004 01:48 GMT | 5 |
I posted yesterday asking if my situation was a good candidate for replication. Cheval responded and said that it was. (See "Good case for replication?" posting). I set up the replica and have made several additions/modifications to the
|
| The field is too small to accept the amount of data... | 03 Sep 2004 16:25 GMT | 1 |
Our Access 2000 replicated database has been synchronizing fine for many months, and there have been no design changes. Some members of the group were upgraded to Access 2003 and we now get the above error
|