| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Copying a database from a network to a non network | 08 May 2004 03:23 GMT | 1 |
We are trying to make a copy of our membership database (which is on a network) an place it on a CD so that we can take the information to our annual meeting which will not be linked to our network. Could anyone give me some
|
| Access 97 to 2000... conversion | 08 May 2004 00:32 GMT | 3 |
I have a replicated Access 97 database that I'm about to convert. It originally contains replicated objects (Forms, Reports, and modules)and their local versios. Since I learned that starting with Access 2000, Design
|
| I originally sent this one on March 9 - Deleted replicas | 07 May 2004 12:06 GMT | 7 |
We suddenly have two "new" choices available from the Syncronization process (pull down selection). We have found the two incorrect locations and removed the databases, but the choices are still showing up on the
|
| Not So Easy: How to determine if replicatiom didn't work? | 07 May 2004 12:04 GMT | 8 |
That might seem like a stupid question, but read the rest. I have a weird problem (I think I have spotted a schema problem but that's another topic, and for another room). Sometimes users synchronize and the customers they just created simply don't replicate. In summary:
|
| failover/disaster recovery questions | 07 May 2004 03:36 GMT | 1 |
We are running a server that runs Replication Manager and services about 30 different MDBs to numerous clients. All is functioning fine and this has historically been a reliable system for us. The question is this: Is there a way to set up an identically configured system (not a ...
|
| publisher and subscriber one the same machine | 06 May 2004 20:16 GMT | 1 |
please any one can solve this problem: i need to make replication between 2 sql server 2000 machine and make the two machines publisher and subscriber in the same time as i need the two machine to update the date on the other machine.
|
| I didn't replicate but db thinks I did | 06 May 2004 13:42 GMT | 2 |
Using Access 2002, I was doing routine db checking (data integrity, # of records entered, etc.), when I checked my lookup tables and found they have three new fields: S_Generation, S_GUID, and S_Lineage. These fields indicate the db is replicated, correct? When I go to Tools,
|
| too long between sync?? | 05 May 2004 20:45 GMT | 2 |
I have a very elaborate database with several replicas. Most of the replicas syrcronize perfectly, however, two of them give error message 3521 stating that it has been too long between syncronization. The two were syncronized on
|
| Replication Error | 05 May 2004 15:20 GMT | 1 |
I am getting this error when I open Microsoft Replication Manager: Microsoft Replication Manager can't open the database ".......". "...." is not a valid path. I have found out that one of the computer where a replica resides has been
|
| Get Default from Last Record | 05 May 2004 13:05 GMT | 2 |
I'm a self-taught beginner at Access, using Access 2002. I am using a form to enter data into a table. Several of my fields are entered repetitively in groups. (I.e. I have to enter "john smith", his "rep #", and
|
| Entry Issues | 04 May 2004 23:22 GMT | 3 |
When users access the EDIT function for records, they often fail to realize that they are on RECORD 1 and begin updating the wrong record. Of course, they don't bother to "fix" their mistake so the "top" record in the table
|
| i want to replicate a database in two different locations | 04 May 2004 18:14 GMT | 2 |
I want to be able to have a database in two different locations and synchronise this. They are not on a network at present. Is there anyway I can do this/ Any help appreciated
|
| Still can't get out of the swamp - invalid http. | 04 May 2004 08:53 GMT | 5 |
I thought my intranet replication problems were over but not so. It works fine (very fast in fact) when run from the Access menubar but fails with the old "invalid http address" when trying to replicate in code I'm using DAO and my code is simple dbFrom.Synchronize strToDb, ...
|