Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / General 2 / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Performance with SQL linked tables

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rotsey - 15 May 2007 06:05 GMT
Hi,

My question is a application performance issue so maybe the wrong forum.

I have a SQL Server 2005 Express database and connected Access 2003 clients.

The performance seems to have degraded since moving from SQL 7.

The users are seeing delays when clicking on menu optiosns that have open
bound forms in Access.

So I have been using the Profiler to have a look at things.

I am filtering events SQL:Batchcompleted and RPC:Completed with duration >
10ms.

I found some issues with the forms loading without filerting rows so i have
changed it
so it does not load any rows on opening.

Anyhow some users say that they are still experiencing delays from the menu.

So my question finally is if I see a delay on my menu but no corresponiding
spike in the profiler can i assume that the problem is with Access and not
SQL.

Any help would be great.

rotsey
Sylvain Lafontaine - 15 May 2007 06:43 GMT
Quick check: first update the statistics (sp_updatestats) or reindexe all
the tables (DBREINDEX on all tables); after that, clear the procedure cache
(DBCC FREEPROCCACHE, DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS).

Signature

Sylvain Lafontaine, ing.
MVP - Technologies Virtual-PC
E-mail: sylvain aei ca (fill the blanks, no spam please)

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> rotsey
Rotsey - 15 May 2007 07:12 GMT
thanks for reply

You say run sp_updatestats or redinex all

Not both??

rotsey

> Quick check: first update the statistics (sp_updatestats) or reindexe all
> the tables (DBREINDEX on all tables); after that, clear the procedure
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>
>> rotsey
Sylvain Lafontaine - 15 May 2007 14:59 GMT
Unless you want a full scan for the statistics, reindexing a table will also
updates its statistics.

Signature

Sylvain Lafontaine, ing.
MVP - Technologies Virtual-PC
E-mail: sylvain aei ca (fill the blanks, no spam please)

> thanks for reply
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>>>
>>> rotsey
Todos Menos [MSFT] - 15 May 2007 16:48 GMT
I'd just reccomend

a) proper indexing
b) simpler architecture using Access Data Projects

On May 15, 6:59 am, "Sylvain Lafontaine" <sylvain aei ca (fill the
blanks, no spam please)> wrote:
> Unless you want a full scan for the statistics, reindexing a table will also
> updates its statistics.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Todos Menos [MSFT] - 15 May 2007 09:36 GMT
linked tables _ALWAYS_ gave me awful performance

that's why I started using access data projects a long long long time
ago

On May 14, 10:05 pm, "Rotsey"
<malcolm_sm...@RemoveThis.optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>  Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> rotsey
Tony Toews [MVP] - 15 May 2007 17:42 GMT
"T o d o s  M e no s   [M S F T ]" <t o do s _ m e no s _ ms f  t@hotmail.com> wrote:

>linked tables _ALWAYS_ gave me awful performance
>
>that's why I started using access data projects a long long long time
>ago

Note that this person is really A a r o n   K e m p f and that he is not an employee
of Microsoft.
Signature

Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
  Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
  Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
  Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/

Todos Menos [MSFT] - 21 May 2007 21:54 GMT
note that tony is neither

MOST
VALUABLE
or a
PROFESSIONAL

anyone with a clue would have started using SQL Server a decade ago;
it is a completely superior platform in all regards-- with no
negatives

only a retard that can't learn a real database would ever use Access
MDB
I mean get real-- move to ADP or real VB-- either way, Access MDB is
dead and it has been for a decade

> "T o d o s  M e no s   [M S F T ]" <t o do s _ m e no s _ ms f  t...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>    Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems athttp://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
>    Tony's Microsoft Access Blog -http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.