Obviously, you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to
Access/JET. Nor do you have any idea who you are dealing with when you refer
to me as "kid". I am surely old enough to be your father, with more years
experience in databases than you are old.
Just to make it absolutely clear, everything you have said below is patently
incorrect with the exception of it being inadvisable to use Access (or any
database) with bound records on an air card. That is just as true, btw, if
you use bound forms with a SQL-Server back-end. A stable network, which does
not include anything like aircards, is a requirement for bound datasets.

Signature
Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP
http://www.datastrat.com
http://www.mvps.org/access
http://www.accessmvp.com
'unless the design is poort'
or
'there is a vpn requirement'
or
'wireless cards act funny, and Access crashes'
or
'you want to run your database-- as is- a decade from now'
or
'you want to use industry-best tools for optimizing indexes'.
I strongly disagree kid.
It has nothing to do with design.
My network is perfectly stable. I don't have any other large files
that ever crash, no.
Indexing becomes critical.
Of course.. 'Access doesn't really support indexing'.
and 'Access doesnt' really support the proper USAGE of indexing'.
Thanks
On Apr 3, 9:32 am, "Arvin Meyer [MVP]" <a...@m.com> wrote:
> The difference in speed should be barely noticeable, unless your database
> design is poor. Never drag entire tables to do local processing. Instead
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
aaron.kempf@gmail.com - 04 Apr 2008 02:22 GMT
what the hell are you talking about Arvin?
you're contradicting every other idiot around here.
Access doesn't support wireless.. or more importantly; when Access
throws a tissyfit.. you dipshits blame it on things like 'the
network'.
I'm a certified DBA.
Are you certified?
You're an idiot that is stuck in the 80s.
Stick a fork in it, loser!
-Aaron
> Obviously, you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to
> Access/JET. Nor do you have any idea who you are dealing with when you refer
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
aaron.kempf@gmail.com - 04 Apr 2008 02:22 GMT
what about.. if your schema 'just doesn't fit' inside of Access?
What if.. you want to see what's really going on in a mission-
critical
database?
What if you want to use replication?
What if you want to take backups _WHILE_ people are using the
database?
What if you want to use database mirroring?
Or Database Snapshots.
Or Reporting Services.
Do you _LIKE_ running reports by hand?
Or do you want them to just automagically get emailed to you once a
night?
Access doesn't support 1/10th of the functionality of SQL Server.
Sorry-- but you lose.
-Aaron
> Obviously, you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to
> Access/JET. Nor do you have any idea who you are dealing with when you refer
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -