> Access is very picky about parentheses.
>
> get a flavor of Access' particular dialect
> of SQL.
Does MS Access have a dialect of SQL? I think you meant to say 'Jet'.
> >I should be able to have both INNER JOIN's, but ACCESS won't seem to allow
> >it.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> job.description FROM (employee INNER JOIN state ON state.statecode =
> employee.statecode) INNER JOIN job ON job.jobcode = employee.jobcode
AFAIK the OP's SQL is entry level SQL-92 compliant and the JOINs would
be performed from left to right. The problem is, the Jet SQL dialect
falls short of entry level SQL-92 and requires the order of JOINs to be
explicitly specified using parentheses, as you have posted. It's
probably a good idea to take this explicit approach in any case so I
wouldn't consider Jet to be deficient in this respect (not that Jet
isn't deficient in the JOINs department e.g. non support for FULL OUTER
JOIN, not being able specify predicates in an OUTER JOIN, etc).
> It may be worthwhile "slumming" in the Query Grid for a bit
The Query Grid, which is part of MS Access, has the opposite problem:
it doesn't really 'understand' the Jet layer and so adds too many
unnecessary parentheses and brackets, just to be ultra-conservative,
making it hard to tell where they are actually required.
Jamie.
--