Can you explain better the last two tables?
why iso1, iso2, iso3?
why do all tables have a name field? and a Vendor number?
> At the moment i have three tables with the following columns:
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Is this a good layout or can you reckon mend a better table layout
Armen Stein - 24 Sep 2008 16:25 GMT
>Can you explain better the last two tables?
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>
>> Is this a good layout or can you reckon mend a better table layout
Yes, usually seeing numbered fields (iso1, iso2, etc.) means that the
structure isn't normalized. It's harder to query later, and you're
out of luck when iso5 comes along.
Also:
- You have a "Name" field in each table after Vendor Number. I hope
that isn't Vendor Name, since that would be retrievable by joining to
the vendor table.
- Is the Group a lookup to another Group table?
- Don't your Comments need a date for each one? How about the person
making the comment?
- How many non-conformities can be in each Comment? Plural fields are
usually a sign of trouble too.
Have you read Database Design for Mere Mortals (Hernandez)? It's a
great way to learn about database design principles.
Hope this helps,
Armen Stein
Microsoft Access MVP
www.JStreetTech.com