
Signature
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no private e-mails, please)
Doug - thanks for the reply.
No, I didn't try it because the way I type (two fingers and a thumb)
it would have taken at least an hour to enter the info. Posting was
much faster :>) and I would like a chance at success :>)
I would agree that normalization makes sense for "serious" database
designs, but this is nothing more than a data dump for a fairly
straightforward Access report.
BTW, I have learned quite a bit from you and the other MVPs in the
various Access newsgroups. Thanks for your efforts - much appreciated!
Regards,
Al
>I believe so, but have you tried it? Wouldn't that have been faster than
>posting a question asking about it?
>
>Hopefully you're going to normalize the data once you import it into your
>database. 241 fields in a single table is probably at least 10 times too
>many.
Al - 20 Mar 2006 04:42 GMT
Just completing the thread.
Marking a field as "skip" in the text import wizard does NOT count
toward the table's 255 fields :)
>Doug - thanks for the reply.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>database. 241 fields in a single table is probably at least 10 times too
>>many.