my experience is that macros (and this includes those embedded in the
buttons) can be lost in such an upgrade.
you should methodically go thru each function of the application and test
with test data.
I would also monitor the data in the tables that you add with your test to
see if it is stable.
the fact that it is working ok for "a day or two" makes me think that there
is a feature broken but it is not a feature used frequently....
unfortunately I can't be sure this will help - but I've seen flaky behavior
due to this...

Signature
NTC
> We have been running a backend Database using Access 97, Ihave been trying
> for sometime to get it upgraded to Access 2k. everytime I get it upgraded
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> jmillerwv
jmillerWV - 10 May 2006 21:31 GMT
thanks for your assistance. the only real problem is the data. The front end
has been in Access 2k for about 2 years or better. It is just when I move the
data from Access 97 to Access 2k that the problem crops up. I will look at
the front end again and see if I cna pinpoint the porblem. Again thanks for
your assistance.
jmillerwv
> my experience is that macros (and this includes those embedded in the
> buttons) can be lost in such an upgrade.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >
> > jmillerwv
NetworkTrade - 11 May 2006 01:45 GMT
it may not be feasible......but I wonder if you open a new db and import both
back-end & front-end - so you unsplit the db ; just to see if it is stable...
if so; then split....
crude guess and probably too manually intensive - may be feasible experiment
if small....

Signature
NTC
> thanks for your assistance. the only real problem is the data. The front end
> has been in Access 2k for about 2 years or better. It is just when I move the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> > >
> > > jmillerwv
jmillerWV - 11 May 2006 16:19 GMT
Believe it or not but I have tried that ( combining the frontend and backend
then splitting them in 2000) same results. I have not tried to run the DB in
the unsplit fasshion but I will try that using an copy of it for test
purposes and see how it goes. Again thanks for your assistance. If it goes
crazy then I will repost.
jmillerwv
> it may not be feasible......but I wonder if you open a new db and import both
> back-end & front-end - so you unsplit the db ; just to see if it is stable...
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> > > >
> > > > jmillerwv
NetworkTrade - 11 May 2006 19:02 GMT
well you know trouble shooting is eliminating unknowns....and working with a
single unsplit version on one pc eliminates alot of unknowns...
in one upgrade 97-2k I lost alot of macros inexplicably....I had to hunt
them down and re-enter....

Signature
NTC
> Believe it or not but I have tried that ( combining the frontend and backend
> then splitting them in 2000) same results. I have not tried to run the DB in
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > jmillerwv
jmillerWV - 11 May 2006 20:02 GMT
Again thank you for your assistance. I will make a dummy db using the current
data and current frontend and try combining them and see what happens. I will
post a new thread when I get the dummy db up and running to let you know how
what I find out. This just happened the front end had a problem when it was
shutting down and requested to send Microsoft the error. got an answer back
MS says up grade to newest verision of Office to solve the problem. I don't
even know what the probelm was. Just thought that was kind of funny, I guess
upgrading always fixes the problem. Have a good day and weekend I will let
you know how it goes.
jmillerwv
> well you know trouble shooting is eliminating unknowns....and working with a
> single unsplit version on one pc eliminates alot of unknowns...
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > jmillerwv
>We have been running a backend Database using Access 97, Ihave been trying
>for sometime to get it upgraded to Access 2k. everytime I get it upgraded
>using the upgrade utility in Access 2k the DB will run for a day or two ok
>then the crazy thing goes bananas. It continually gives errors that this is
>not a recognized database format and so on.
This frequent corruption upon upgrading to A2000 can be caused by the
Oplocks problem. However this hasn't been a problem for a year or two
if the server and workstations OSs are up to the latest service pack
level.
I wonder if the A2000 are all at the most recent SP? And if the Jet
4.0 SP are all the same and reasonably current?
What I've done is use the various API calls available and am checking
the version number and date/time of a crucial dll, msjetxx.dll, to
ensure it matches what I have on my system. See the Verify
Appropriate Jet Service Pack is installed page at my website for more
details including sample code:
www.granite.ab.ca\access\verifyjetsp.htm
What is the OS running on your server?
Tony

Signature
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
jmillerWV - 18 May 2006 14:09 GMT
Tony,
Thanks for the reply. the os of the server is Small Business Server 2003 sp1
fully patched. Operating systems of the work stations is a mix of Windows XP
Pro SP@ fully patched, and Windows 2000 Pro updated and patched. All OS's are
kept updated weekly by myself. My phylosophy is " An updated and Patched OS
is a happy OS." I will take a look at your suggestion on the jet verify and
let you know.
Again thanks for the reply.
jmillerwv
> >We have been running a backend Database using Access 97, Ihave been trying
> >for sometime to get it upgraded to Access 2k. everytime I get it upgraded
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Tony
Tony Toews - 21 May 2006 02:56 GMT
>Thanks for the reply. the os of the server is Small Business Server 2003 sp1
>fully patched. Operating systems of the work stations is a mix of Windows XP
>Pro SP@ fully patched, and Windows 2000 Pro updated and patched. All OS's are
>kept updated weekly by myself. My phylosophy is " An updated and Patched OS
>is a happy OS."
Ok, good. I just wanted to double check that you weren't on some real
old OSs or running a four year old version of ****nix on the server.
Tony

Signature
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm