I've tried that, and it only makes my footer section shorter. In the view and
the print, that gap is still there. I've also tried inserting a group footer
and adding very short vertical lines to try to bridge that gap, but they run
off onto the next page.
I hate it when my computer is smarter than me. =(
Have you checked the details section All tab for Force new page or New Row or
Col??
> I've tried that, and it only makes my footer section shorter. In the view and
> the print, that gap is still there. I've also tried inserting a group footer
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> > > my measurements, and for legal reasons, this report MUST look the way I have
> > > it. Does anyone know how to eliminate this gap?
deskmonkey - 11 Mar 2008 16:11 GMT
My report has 4 sections in total: page header, group header, detail and page
footer. Of those sections, only the group header has the "Force New Page" set
to something besides None (actual setting is Before Section). The "New Row or
Col" is set to None for both detail and group header.
> Have you checked the details section All tab for Force new page or New Row or
> Col??
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > > > my measurements, and for legal reasons, this report MUST look the way I have
> > > > it. Does anyone know how to eliminate this gap?
deskmonkey - 11 Mar 2008 17:19 GMT
Ok, figured it out!
You're right - it was the length of the footer. I went back and instead of
adjusting it by dragging the edge of the field, I went into the Properties
field and adjusted it 1/10,000 of an inch at a time. It took a while, but the
gap is now gone. Thank you!
> Have you checked the details section All tab for Force new page or New Row or
> Col??
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > > > my measurements, and for legal reasons, this report MUST look the way I have
> > > > it. Does anyone know how to eliminate this gap?
scott04 - 11 Mar 2008 18:55 GMT
Glad everything worked out for you
> Ok, figured it out!
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > > > > my measurements, and for legal reasons, this report MUST look the way I have
> > > > > it. Does anyone know how to eliminate this gap?