>I did what you suggested & didn't get a display of "0", then went to the
>original table and to the field in question. In each record, I hit "delete"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I'm sure once I figure out what the problem is, I'll feel as stupid as a box
>of hammers.
After you "deleted" the value in the table field, did the
text box stay red?
If it did, then, just in case there are multiple lines of
blanks, try going back into the table. Click in the field,
hit Ctrl+Home and then Shift+Ctrl+End followed by Delete.
If that doesn't do it, the only other thing I can think of
is that the text box contains has a control source
experession that is concatenating something to the field
value.

Signature
Marsh
MVP [MS Access]
Sue - 30 Dec 2007 22:09 GMT
The text box is red only where data exists in the field. Where there is no
data, there is no red... but there's just as much space as if there were
indeed data in the field.
Your next suggestion was:
> If it did, then, just in case there are multiple lines of
> blanks, try going back into the table. Click in the field,
> hit Ctrl+Home and then Shift+Ctrl+End followed by Delete.
Do I need to do this with each field?

Signature
Thanks for your time!
> >I did what you suggested & didn't get a display of "0", then went to the
> >original table and to the field in question. In each record, I hit "delete"
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> experession that is concatenating something to the field
> value.
Marshall Barton - 31 Dec 2007 03:58 GMT
>The text box is red only where data exists in the field. Where there is no
>data, there is no red... but there's just as much space as if there were
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> hit Ctrl+Home and then Shift+Ctrl+End followed by Delete.
>Do I need to do this with each field?
If the red is not showing when there is no data in the text
box, then the text box is shrinking. The problem is then
that there is some other control with its Top above the
bottom of the shrinking text box that is preventing the
section from shrinking.
You said there are no other controls in the same horizontal
band as the shrinking text box, but the evidence says
otherwise. Double check that other controls that you may
think are below the shrinking text box do not intrude into
that band, even by a little bit.
If you have trouble finding such a control, try (in design
view) clicking on any control and using the Tab key to cycle
through all the controls in the section.

Signature
Marsh
MVP [MS Access]
Sue - 31 Dec 2007 09:47 GMT
I thought sure your "tab through controls" idea would reveal the problem, but
there was no shared real estate. So for the heck of it - being completely out
of ideas - I set the "page header" control's "visible" property to "NO". And
the unused space in the "details" section promptly vanished.
I'll be darned if I can explain that.
You've stuck with me patiently & I appreciate your help!

Signature
Thanks for your time!
> >The text box is red only where data exists in the field. Where there is no
> >data, there is no red... but there's just as much space as if there were
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> view) clicking on any control and using the Tab key to cycle
> through all the controls in the section.
Marshall Barton - 31 Dec 2007 16:48 GMT
>I thought sure your "tab through controls" idea would reveal the problem, but
>there was no shared real estate. So for the heck of it - being completely out
>of ideas - I set the "page header" control's "visible" property to "NO". And
>the unused space in the "details" section promptly vanished.
>
>I'll be darned if I can explain that.
That's a new one on me! I can't imagine what the visibility
of the page header section or its controls has to do with
shrinking the detail section. I can see where that might
affect the detail section's KeepTogether behavior, but not
its shrinking.

Signature
Marsh
MVP [MS Access]
Sue - 31 Dec 2007 17:51 GMT
I'll be dipped if I know.
Feels like the Twilight Zone.
Again, thanks.

Signature
Thanks for your time!
> >I thought sure your "tab through controls" idea would reveal the problem, but
> >there was no shared real estate. So for the heck of it - being completely out
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> affect the detail section's KeepTogether behavior, but not
> its shrinking.