It sounds to me like you have "committed spreadsheet" by creating fields
rather than records. I could be wrong but you haven't provided much
information or sample records.
If you can't normalize your data, you should consider creating a union query
that would create 20 related records from the values in 20 fields. You could
then link these 20 records to the C-DTable and display the descriptions.

Signature
Duane Hookom
MS Access MVP
> Have Report based on Table1
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> thnx
NetworkTrade - 04 Aug 2006 14:49 GMT
thanks - in this case I don't think there is a normalization problem. The
central Device Table has just one record per device as it should.
Each device is custom made with about 20 parameters - and there is a pool of
15,000 pre-defined parameter records in a C-D Table (Code-Description Table).
So a record of one device in the Device Table has generally 20 fields each
with a code. And the sum of 20 codes effectively describes that device for
the end user.
Its pretty efficient in this regard. In whipping up an easy Report from
this central Device Table it is of course only showing the codes for each
device record - as it should - but many humans also need the corresponding
description from the C-D Table (which should not be duplicated in the central
Device Table) as a visual aid.
Will try the Union as you suggest. I was thinking that label(s) along side
the codes in the report would/could be the way to go with them bound or
calling the appropriate description from the CD Table that corresponds to a
code...obviously am experimenting around with this.
As some of the descriptions are lengthy am a little worried on exceeding
record length max but not sure if that is an issue for a query based union as
long as it is not a single table record.
thanks again,

Signature
NTC
> It sounds to me like you have "committed spreadsheet" by creating fields
> rather than records. I could be wrong but you haven't provided much
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >
> > thnx
Duane Hookom - 04 Aug 2006 21:00 GMT
I would have table of parameter values with 20 records rather than 20
fields.This would allow linking to the code-description table.

Signature
Duane Hookom
MS Access MVP
> thanks - in this case I don't think there is a normalization problem. The
> central Device Table has just one record per device as it should.
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>> >
>> > thnx