> Now the 1000 Days are over ...
> I tried today to change the retention period by using the
> JRO-method as described above.

Signature
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
>> Now the 1000 Days are over ...
>> I tried today to change the retention period by using the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>done -- there is no way to recover it so that it can be a
>synchronizable replica again.
Hi David,
Thanks for your answer.
(you gave me already some help already Sept 29th 2005)
Detail information about my DB:
1. developed in A97 (started in year 1998)
2. converted in A2000 --> working with replication
10 years later - This is now my configuration (since 2005):
3. Changing to a Terminalserver-Environment (Terminalserver 2003/Access 2003
in Access 2000 Mode)
Therefore I use the Designmaster on Terminalserver - splitted in BE+FEs (14
FEs) -
as recommended in some postings on accessmonster.com. This works great! I
have no other replicas which are generated with replication manager (only the
FEs which are copy from Designmaster-FE)!!
That means I don´t work with replication an I need not to synchronize.
(INFO: great advantage of using the Designmaster is that user of the FEs
can´t make changes in forms, reports an so on).
The problem since yesterday is that every time you start the DB (FE) the
message ("must synchronize the replicat within xx days / can`t synchronize
the replicat ......) is displayed; it`s
not really funny for the 14 users.
I had this problem already in the year 2005. 2005 I changed the retention
period (from 60 to 1000) as described in my posting (now 994 days are over);
but now it isn´t possible to change the retention period.
That means I only need a possibility to change the retention period in
Designmaster, then no message appears and all users are lucky
I hope you understand my problem ...
Thank you
Chris
David W. Fenton - 26 Apr 2008 00:10 GMT
"info27 via AccessMonster.com" <u11672@uwe> wrote in news:8331e7579ae75
@uwe:
> I hope you understand my problem ...
The problem is that you're replicating front ends. You shouldn't do
that, as Jet replication really only works well for back ends.
If you don't want your users to make changes, then make your front ends
MDEs.

Signature
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
info27 - 26 Apr 2008 13:42 GMT
>"info27 via AccessMonster.com" <u11672@uwe> wrote in news:8331e7579ae75
>@uwe:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>If you don't want your users to make changes, then make your front ends
>MDEs.
Hello,
Thanks for helping ...
It works.
Best regards
Chris