akbertram@gmail.com wrote in
news:a80a4865-8583-4773-b78d-f77efe8a43f4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.co
m:
> The database will be used in 4 field sites of different
> organisations with intermittent connections to the internet. The
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> IT policies that won't allow the install of NetDrive... It also
> seems woefully complex.
Doesn't work, as Indirect synchronization requires IIS running on
the Internet host server.
> 2) Internet synchronization using a hosted IIS server. Don't know
> if this is possible given that I won't be able to run the
> synchronizer on the server. But surely there must be a way to get
> the clients to upload msg files, for the hub database (running on
> my PC) to check in periodically with the FTP folder, and leave
> results?
If you can't run the Internet synchronizer on the IIS server, then
you can't use Internet synchronization.
> 3) Rolling my own synchronizer that creates simple xml "msg" files
> that encapsulate changes that can be emailed to the hub database.
> Anyway to get jet to produce these msg files for me?
>
> Any thoughts on which of these is the most viable?
None of them are viable.
Consider setting up a workstation and VPN connections as your hub
for indirect replication. That way you isolate the replication
operations and the running synchronizer from your server machines
and that should keep your IT people happy.

Signature
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/