 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
MS Access Forum / Replication / February 2007Vista Synchronization
When we attempt to Internet sync on any computer using Vista, we get this error: --------------------------------- Microsft Visual C++Runtime Library X Assertion failed! Program:... File z:\COMMON\inc\safestrfuncs.h Line:108 Expression:s_OK= = hr For information on how your program can cause an assertion failure, se the visual C ++ documentation on asserts (Please retry to debug the application JIT must be enabled) ABORT RETRY IGNORE ------------------------- How can we resolve this? Thanks in advance: > When we attempt to Internet sync on any computer using Vista, we > get this error: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Thanks in advance: Are you using DAO or JRO for this? What version of Access?  SignatureDavid W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ David: We are using DAO, Access 2000. JRO gave us problems with deployment to our more than a thousand users. We have granted rights to our application and the data set but suspect that the Jet Synchronizer has a file that is violating the UAC (user account control)? A JRO utility could be used for a temporary solution. Thank you and I look forward to your response. RB >> When we attempt to Internet sync on any computer using Vista, we >> get this error: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Are you using DAO or JRO for this? What version of Access? >>> When we attempt to Internet sync on any computer using Vista, we >>> get this error: [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > We are using DAO, Access 2000. JRO gave us problems with > deployment to our more than a thousand users. I'm not fan of JRO, myself. I do know that DAO is broken in A2K7, and perhaps the reason is the same as the problem you're hitting running on Vista. > We have granted rights to our application and the data set but > suspect that the Jet Synchronizer has a file that is violating the > UAC (user account control)? The synchronizer doesn't write any data except to the dropbox and to the location of any unmanaged replica that you try to synch with. > A JRO utility could be used for a temporary solution. > > Thank you and I look forward to your response. I don't do Internet replication, to be honest (I don't see its utility any longer with VPNs so common), so can't give you specific advice. All that I've written above somewhat assumes that the Internet synchrnizer works more or less the same as the indirect synchronizer, which may be completely wrong. SignatureDavid W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ David: Thank you for your replies, we're going to try the JRO method, and I'll post the result. With hundreds of unrelated users, Internet synchronization avoids VPN security and support related issues. If a VPN connection is interrupted, the replica being synchronized to is frequently corrupted and had to be replaced. The transaction basis of the Internet synchronization gives us more reliable results. RB >>>> When we attempt to Internet sync on any computer using Vista, we >>>> get this error: [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > Internet synchrnizer works more or less the same as the indirect > synchronizer, which may be completely wrong. > With hundreds of unrelated users, Internet synchronization avoids > VPN security and support related issues. If a VPN connection is > interrupted, the replica being synchronized to is frequently > corrupted and had to be replaced. Not if you you use indirect replication. I was not at all suggesting DIRECT replication over a VPN over the Internet! The transaction basis of the Internet synchronization gives us > more reliable results. But Internet replication brings a dependency on IIS, and I consider that unacceptable (because IIS is unacceptable, and because Jet replication doesn't need any more dependencies than it already has). Indirect replication works just fine over a VPN and it matters not one bit whether or not the VPN goes down during the synch, as all that will be lost is the files dropped in the synchronizer dropboxes (just like with Internet replication). SignatureDavid W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ David: Unfortunately, the JRO Internet synchronization reports the same error as ADO on the Vista OS. Boo hiss. >> With hundreds of unrelated users, Internet synchronization avoids >> VPN security and support related issues. If a VPN connection is [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > that will be lost is the files dropped in the synchronizer dropboxes > (just like with Internet replication). > Unfortunately, the JRO Internet synchronization reports the same > error as ADO on the Vista OS. What version of Access are you using here? Do you have the latest Jet Replication update files? SignatureDavid W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ David: Access 2K latest updates, SR1, SR3, and sp8. The clients may not. That is certainly worth a try. I'll post the results. Thanks, Robert >> Unfortunately, the JRO Internet synchronization reports the same >> error as ADO on the Vista OS. > > What version of Access are you using here? Do you have the latest > Jet Replication update files? >>> Unfortunately, the JRO Internet synchronization reports the same >>> error as ADO on the Vista OS. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Access 2K latest updates, SR1, SR3, and sp8. The clients may not. > That is certainly worth a try. I'll post the results. But what about the replication files? Those are not part of Access or Jet, so don't get updated -- only the Jet Replication Security update does that. SignatureDavid W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ Thanks, I'll try that out. >>>> Unfortunately, the JRO Internet synchronization reports the same >>>> error as ADO on the Vista OS. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > or Jet, so don't get updated -- only the Jet Replication Security > update does that. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.