
Signature
HTH
Dale
Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
email address is invalid
Please reply to newsgroup only.
> Jake,
>
> I think I understand, you have a select query that returns values to a
> bound form or some other form of recordset, and you want to be able to change
> the values that are returned by that query in your form? Is that correct?
> If so, I would defer
yes, exactly.
> If so, why aren't you using linked tables?
I am using linked tables now. However I am trying to get away from them
because I need to compile it into an mde and I have too many objects to do
so. so, I am trying to reduce the number of objects.
> You can create links to the SQL Server tables and just use the linked table
> in your bound forms. You could also use unbound forms, and with very little
> effort write a query that issues an UPDATE command to the backend database
> when you change records (after checking to determine which fields have
> changed).
yes, that is also a posibility. I don't know that I agree about it being
very littel effort.
Rick Brandt - 13 May 2008 23:52 GMT
>> Jake,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> them because I need to compile it into an mde and I have too many
> objects to do so. so, I am trying to reduce the number of objects.
Hmm, One table link versus one passthrough query is the same number of
objects isn't it?

Signature
Rick Brandt, Microsoft Access MVP
Email (as appropriate) to...
RBrandt at Hunter dot com