Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Queries / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

True or False?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jacob - 26 May 2005 14:52 GMT
Despite MS Access limitations, users should still be able to create queries
to meet all their query needs. Thus there is no need for users to feel that
they can't ascertain certain information.  True or False?

I ask this question, because i feel that i'm very limited due to
restrictions in Access implementation of subqueries and operators. What i
want to do seems basic to me, but out of reach. Is this typical?
Ken Snell [MVP] - 26 May 2005 15:29 GMT
Your question begins with a "straw man" that you then try to rationalize.
What limitations are the focus of your question? Queries can be simple or
complex. Creating queries can be as "straightforward" as writing an SQL
statement or using the QBE view in ACCESS -- or they can be more
user-friendly by providing controls on a form that allow the user to set the
filtering conditions and then the form's programming creates the query.

And anything in-between and outside this.

Signature

       Ken Snell
<MS ACCESS MVP>

> Despite MS Access limitations, users should still be able to create
> queries
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> restrictions in Access implementation of subqueries and operators. What i
> want to do seems basic to me, but out of reach. Is this typical?
jacob - 26 May 2005 19:16 GMT
Not being able to use DISTINCT with aggregation functions.
Not being able to use UNION in subqueries.
Not being able to do Correlated queries.

I've been able to avoid these by rewriting my queries. But now that they've
been rewritten, they cannot be expanded very much.  Thus i have to RUN many
queries one after the other, changing a few IDs, to get the information i
need. This is time consuming.

Not to mention all the work getting around Access particularities.

I can post my queries, but to me, they are not very simple.
Ken Snell [MVP] - 26 May 2005 19:42 GMT
This is a fairly generic list, so I won't try to respond to them here. If
you have a specific example, post it and we'll see what we might suggest for
a different approach.

Signature

       Ken Snell
<MS ACCESS MVP>

> Not being able to use DISTINCT with aggregation functions.
> Not being able to use UNION in subqueries.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> I can post my queries, but to me, they are not very simple.
jacob - 26 May 2005 20:33 GMT
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.