Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Multiuser / Networking / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2002 format vs 2000

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rono - 26 Oct 2006 13:50 GMT
I have a dotnet app that uses Access as the database.  The database can be
used by multiple users of the program.  Currently the database is in Access
2000 format.  I'm wondering if converting the database to 2002-2003 format
would make it less suceptible to corruption or provider other benifits.
Thanks.

Ron
Alex Dybenko - 26 Oct 2006 15:27 GMT
Hi,
2000 and 2002-2003 formats are the same from dotnet app point of view, only
"access part" of format has some differences

Signature

Best regards,
___________
Alex Dybenko (MVP)
http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
http://www.PointLtd.com

>I have a dotnet app that uses Access as the database.  The database can be
>used by multiple users of the program.  Currently the database is in Access
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Ron
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.