Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Multiuser / Networking / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Multi User Queries taking forever....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roman B. - 18 Jan 2006 07:02 GMT
We have 10 users using access XP 2002, accessing an access database with
about 300,000 records. currently it is taking about 6-8 minutes per lookup on
the database which resides on a windows 2003 server with 2 gigs of Ram. Is
this normal or is there something I can do to speed the lookups? My systems
are running windows XP SP2 with at least 512 megs ram with most close to a
gig a ram locally.
Van T. Dinh - 18 Jan 2006 11:54 GMT
(multiple replies in Queries newsgroup)

Please do not multipost the same question in different newsgroups.  Please
see:

http://www.mvps.org/access/netquette.htm

Signature

HTH
Van T. Dinh
MVP (Access)

> We have 10 users using access XP 2002, accessing an access database with
> about 300,000 records. currently it is taking about 6-8 minutes per lookup
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> are running windows XP SP2 with at least 512 megs ram with most close to a
> gig a ram locally.
Roman B. - 18 Jan 2006 14:42 GMT
Hey Van,

Thanks for the heads up, however I've posted in microsft newsgroups before
only to be told that I my question should be posted in another newsgroup.

Thanks I'll check out your link.

> (multiple replies in Queries newsgroup)
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > are running windows XP SP2 with at least 512 megs ram with most close to a
> > gig a ram locally.
Rick Brandt - 18 Jan 2006 14:59 GMT
> Hey Van,
>
> Thanks for the heads up, however I've posted in microsft newsgroups
> before only to be told that I my question should be posted in another
> newsgroup.

In that case you should crosspost rather than multi-post (to a reasonably
short list of groups).  See link for explanation.

http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html

Signature

I don't check the Email account attached
to this message.     Send instead to...
RBrandt    at       Hunter      dot      com

Van T. Dinh - 18 Jan 2006 15:11 GMT
If you read a few Microsoft Access newsgroups, you will notice that regular
respondents read and reply to posts in a large number of Access newsgroups.
Provide that your question is related to Access, I think you find, in
general, the same group of respondents who will reply to your question
regardless of the Access newsgroup you posted to.

OTOH, you can use cross-posting to make your question appearing in a number
of groups (max 3 newsgroups only, please) as Rick advised and you can check
all answers regardless of which newsgroup you want to look at.

Signature

HTH
Van T. Dinh
MVP (Access)

> Hey Van,
>
> Thanks for the heads up, however I've posted in microsft newsgroups before
> only to be told that I my question should be posted in another newsgroup.
>
> Thanks I'll check out your link.
Roman B. - 18 Jan 2006 17:55 GMT
Thanks ... Next Time I'll use the crossposting feature.

thanks again
roman

> If you read a few Microsoft Access newsgroups, you will notice that regular
> respondents read and reply to posts in a large number of Access newsgroups.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > Thanks I'll check out your link.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.