
Signature
Kind Regards
Damiaan
e: info at dampee.be
w: http://www.dampee.be
i would be thrilled with 356,000, but unfortunately, based on the specs i
gave it works out to 3,650,000 per year (big difference). also, i've done a
review of all indexes, field lenghts, etc...and all the table are optimized.
> 1) review all indexes and add/remove where necaisarry
> 2) 356000 records per year in one table is not that much. It depends also a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> > ps we will be moving to SQL within the next year, but we need a solution
> > during the interim.
Van T. Dinh - 25 Jun 2005 11:58 GMT
I would certainly move to one of the heavyweight database engine like SQL
Server, etc ...

Signature
HTH
Van T. Dinh
MVP (Access)
> i would be thrilled with 356,000, but unfortunately, based on the specs i
> gave it works out to 3,650,000 per year (big difference). also, i've done a
> review of all indexes, field lenghts, etc...and all the table are optimized.