Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Modules / DAO / VBA / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Multiple Backend MDBs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Cunningham - 31 Oct 2006 21:46 GMT
I have an application in Access that gets it primary data from a backend
database. "appbe.mdb". This backend resides on a server in the client's
office.

One feature of the app is the ability to "check out" records from the server
backend and place them in another backend that resides on the user's local
drive with the front end database.  Checking out the records works swell.
BUT, when the laptop is taken into the field and the server is not connected
the app crashes on startup because the server backend is not found.

Is there a way to allow the app at start up to ignore this warning? Can I
allow the user to select the server backend or the local backend at startup?

Please help.
Damian S - 01 Nov 2006 00:32 GMT
Hi Bill,

Have you considered using Replication to handle this for you?

Damian.

> I have an application in Access that gets it primary data from a backend
> database. "appbe.mdb". This backend resides on a server in the client's
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Please help.
Bill Cunningham - 01 Nov 2006 13:59 GMT
I'm don't understand everything I need to about replication, but the design
calls for the ability to query a specific project to check out records and
work in the field.  I'll look into replication.  Is there any way to keep the
front end from crashing is the linked tables are not found?

> Hi Bill,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> > Please help.
Bill Cunningham - 01 Nov 2006 14:53 GMT
What if I set up a seperate front end for remote use and linked it to a
remote backend which I could populate with the query and check out process?

I think I would have to disable the ability to add records since the main
table is autonumbered and the related tables are linked with a recno field
which matches.

It looks like replication will solve this problem because the autonumber
fields are changed to random.

What do you think?

> Hi Bill,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> > Please help.
Damian S - 02 Nov 2006 01:41 GMT
Hi Bill,

Replication is definitely the way to go for any time you have users that
require access to the system on a notebook PC away from your network.  The
Notebook users have a copy of the system locally and a copy of the replicated
data locally, and they never connect to the network version.  The trick is to
put a button on the main form that says "Synchronise Now" or similar that
fires off the replication, and get your staff to do that every time they open
the system when they are connected to the network.

If you have users on the network who do NOT require access to the system
remotely, then have them using a standard version of the system with linked
tables to the networked back end - no need for them to synchronise then.

Replication isn't as scary as you may think - make a test copy and give it a
try!!

Damian.

> What if I set up a seperate front end for remote use and linked it to a
> remote backend which I could populate with the query and check out process?
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > >
> > > Please help.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.