"TomP" <tommytipee@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1147704800.958110.106850
@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> Outlet_Size
> 0
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Can anyone shed any light as to why the different values?
One is interpolating, the other one is taking the nearest data point. I
don't think that either one is wrong or right -- in this case, it's
simply a weakness of using percentiles (or, in this case you've specified
three sf, so it's actually a mill-ile): in some statistical circles it
would be called dishonest.
> Does the Excel function work in a different way?
Evidently. What question do you want to answer:
1) if these data were representative of a whole population of something,
how big an outlet size would be big enough for the smallest two-thirds?
2) out of these data, how big an outlet is big enough for the smallest
two-thirds?
When you know which is the right question, you'll be able to get the
correct solution!
> Ultimately, my results in
> Access need to be consistently the same as in Excel.
Don't they need rather to be correct?
HTH
Tim F