My apology. As too often happens I did not explain myself properly.
The routine takes the email address from the member database appends
the alternative address from the member database to make a table that
is both addresses combined.
Now I need to be left with unique addresses in the easiest way.
Thanks,
Robin Chapple
>My apology. As too often happens I did not explain myself properly.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Now I need to be left with unique addresses in the easiest way.
Please post the SQL view of this query. Since I don't have any idea
how the query is structured or what it contains, it's a bit difficult
to give advice! Is its Unique property set? Does it contain fields
other than the email address? If you have two email addresses for the
same person, how can you determine which one to use?
John W. Vinson[MVP]
Robin Chapple - 29 Dec 2004 21:25 GMT
I am using three queries.
First to delete the existing records from the table.
The second to append primary email addresses.
The third to append secondary email addresses.
The database has only one field.
I have set the property to " No duplicates " which seems to achieve
the object. Is this an acceptable answer?
Duplication of addresses occurs for a variety of reasons which are
beyond my control. I just need unique addresses.
Thanks,
Robin Chapple
>Please post the SQL view of this query. Since I don't have any idea
>how the query is structured or what it contains, it's a bit difficult
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>>Now I need to be left with unique addresses in the easiest way.
John Vinson - 29 Dec 2004 23:15 GMT
>I have set the property to " No duplicates " which seems to achieve
>the object. Is this an acceptable answer?
Sure. It's working then? You have no further difficulties?
John W. Vinson[MVP]
Robin Chapple - 30 Dec 2004 08:27 GMT
Yes John,
If that is an acceptable method.
Thanks,
Robin
>>I have set the property to " No duplicates " which seems to achieve
>>the object. Is this an acceptable answer?
>
>Sure. It's working then? You have no further difficulties?
>
> John W. Vinson[MVP]