>Hi,
>I'm obviously new to access and am trying to replicate a sold access 97
>product. This product used around 6 tables of which most are useless to me.
>Data entry is via a form with a scanner which occassionally misreads my
>customer name barcodes, so combo boxes are not likely to be time effective as
>there are hundreds of them.
Well... I would have answered differently had I known that, of course.
My telepathy must have been on the blink... <g>
>I will definetely give a customer table a go. The
>query you helped me with will do the job, but I'll have to figure out what
>this 'Query by form technique' is. Sounds the type of thing I'm after. Any
>links for that?
Open a Form based on your table. On the menu, select Filter... and use
the Filter by Form option. Give it a try!
John W. Vinson[MVP]
Floyd - 02 Aug 2006 03:06 GMT
Hi John,
That was great, thanx very much. I’m now experimenting my new form with the
old Access 97 tables.
In the customer table I have CustID ( Autonumber ) and Customer Name ( text
) fields, there is also address and ph. no. fields that I don’t require. In
the Outbound table I have CustId with many other fields.
In the 97 form ( security protected ) Customer name is the input value (
and also displayed in reports ), but this field is not in the Outbound table,
the CustID autonumber is shown.
In my new form (almost a replica ), the autonumber is shown where I want the
Customer Name displayed/entered.
Using 1 table I managed to get what I wanted for now, unforunately amongst
other requirements I need the customer name value recognised, if it isn’t I
should have to correct it or use another form/sub-form to enter the new
customer name in the customer table.
I have tried various relationships, look-ups and property changes to no
avail. I tried most at CustID – CustID relationship, and a couple at CustID
– Customer Name. Which is it, if any, or is there another way?
The 97 program seems to use a very simple form for ‘create report using
wizard’. I’ve obviously got a long way to go!!
I’ll apologise in advance for the hassle, I have passed E-learning Access
2003 courses, but their idea of ‘expert’ is pitiful.
> >Hi,
> >I'm obviously new to access and am trying to replicate a sold access 97
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> John W. Vinson[MVP]