
Signature
Albert D. Kallal (Access MVP)
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
pleaseNOOSpamKallal@msn.com
http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKallal
> If you are using access 2003, then you can right click on any object, and
> choose "object dependences"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The only real downfall is this option turns on track-autoname correct. But,
> I just turn that off when done viewing the dependencies.
Actually, there's another downfall, too -- although it does a pretty
good job, it's not comprehensive. For example, your program might
compute a name that it uses to access some object; a computed name will
not appear in the list. So... yes, use Access 2003 if you can, but
don't expect it to do all the work. (Check with Help for a list of
types of references that won't be listed.)
-- Vincent Johns <vjohns@alumni.caltech.edu>
Please feel free to quote anything I say here.
Albert D.Kallal - 24 Sep 2005 06:08 GMT
> Actually, there's another downfall, too -- although it does a pretty good
> job, it's not comprehensive. For example, your program might compute a
> name that it uses to access some object; a computed name will not appear
> in the list.
I totally agree with the above. Any code that prompts for a query, or lets a
user "select" a query from a listbox etc. will not help (and, I tend to have
lots of stuff like that).

Signature
Albert D. Kallal (Access MVP)
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
pleaseNOOSpamKallal@msn.com
http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKallal