Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Forms Programming / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Users Do not have Access 2003 on their laptops

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich Pearson - 13 Oct 2005 01:49 GMT
My users only have Access 97 on their machines.  Is there a way that I can
install Access 2003 on the network and users can use it without having Access
2003 on their machines?

Also, is Access 2003 compatible with win98 ?

Thanks,
Rich
Brendan Reynolds - 13 Oct 2005 02:04 GMT
First question, you could use Terminal Server, but although in that
situation users would not have to have Access 2003 physically installed, my
understanding is that each user would need an Access 2003 licence.

Second question, no, Office 2003 requires Windows 2000 or later.

With the Access Developer Extensions you can distribute a runtime version of
Access (Access with design features disabled) to enable users who do not
have retail Access installed to run your applications, but you still need
Windows 2000 or later.

Signature

Brendan Reynolds

> My users only have Access 97 on their machines.  Is there a way that I can
> install Access 2003 on the network and users can use it without having
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks,
> Rich
Rich Pearson - 13 Oct 2005 02:57 GMT
What if I took Access 2003 out of the equation and used Access97 as the
backend and created a Web user interface?  The user doesn't want to upgrade
at this time.

Thanks,
Rich

>First question, you could use Terminal Server, but although in that
>situation users would not have to have Access 2003 physically installed, my
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> Thanks,
>> Rich
Brendan Reynolds - 13 Oct 2005 08:32 GMT
If you use server-side technologies, such as ASP or ASP.NET, nothing is
required on the client PC except a browser. The downside is that developing
these applications costs a lot more and takes a lot longer than developing
Access applications.

Signature

Brendan Reynolds

> What if I took Access 2003 out of the equation and used Access97 as the
> backend and created a Web user interface?  The user doesn't want to
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rich
Albert D.Kallal - 13 Oct 2005 02:05 GMT
You can run a 15 year old version of ms-access on a brand new pc.

However, I can't run ms-access on a 1981 pc, since that pc likely does not
even have a mouse!! On the other hand, you will find it AMAZING that you can
run 1981 software on a BRAND NEW box today!!

So, the rule for more then 20+ years in our industry is that you can usually
go forward, but not backwards.

> Also, is Access 2003 compatible with win98 ?

No, office 2002 (or what is know as office XP was the LAST version that runs
on windows 9x).

> Is there a way that I can
> install Access 2003 on the network and users can use it without having
> Access
> 2003 on their machines?

Yes, you can do the above. First, please read the following on splitting a
database. It is a simple concept, and if you adopt this concept, then you
access 97 users, and access 2003 users can use the SAME DATA!!

So, read the following first:

http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKallal/Articles/split/index.htm

Ok, so what you do is now provide a front end in access 97 to those
people/computers with access 97. For those users that have access 2003, then
you provide a access 2003 front end. Then, as time goes by, and those a97
users upgrade, you simply upgrade them to access 2003 front ends.

The back end that you link to must however remain in access97 format until
such time as all users have upgraded.

And, if the users machines have windows xp on them, then you could consider
using the ms-access runtime system, as then they don't necessary have to
have access installed.

Signature

Albert D. Kallal   (Access MVP)
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
pleaseNOOSpamKallal@msn.com
http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKallal

Ken Snell [MVP] - 13 Oct 2005 02:05 GMT
Read the EULA for Office and ACCESS... I don't think the EULA permits you to
install one copy on a network and let multiple users use that one copy.

ACCESS 2003 will not run on Windows 98. Must be Windows 2000 or "higher"
version.

Signature

       Ken Snell
<MS ACCESS MVP>

> My users only have Access 97 on their machines.  Is there a way that I can
> install Access 2003 on the network and users can use it without having
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks,
> Rich
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.