Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Forms Programming / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Access97: Combo Box and FE/BE split

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jonathan Scott - 30 Mar 2005 03:58 GMT
I am trying to split my database into a front-end and a back-end.

I could not find a way to keep my forms' Combo Box as a Table/Query, as the
database has become remote and there is no way to make the Table/Query type
Combo Box query that other database.

So I decided to make it a Value-list Combo Box and query the DB, creating
the properly delimited string for the values to appear in that Combo Box. I
try running it, and what do I get? The string making up the values for the
Combo Box is too long!

Is there a better way to go about this? The only other way I can think to
keep my Combo Box as a Table/Query is to try and create a link locally to
the table I need before I open the form. Does anyone else know how to get
around this "too long" problem, or how to make Access97 use my string
despite its length?

Jonathan Scott
Larry  Linson - 30 Mar 2005 05:29 GMT
In a split FE / BE environment, you link the Tables in the BE and use the
table name of the link. If, as many do, you name the table-link in your
database the same as the name of the table in the BE, it will simplify your
debugging. One way to handle the RowSource of Combo Boxes is to use a Query.

 Larry Linson
 Microsoft Access MVP

> I am trying to split my database into a front-end and a back-end.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Jonathan Scott
Jonathan Scott - 30 Mar 2005 06:34 GMT
Many thanks!

I now realize one or more of my assumptions were incorrect. The size of the
database after the split led me to believe that the frontend was in fact
still holding the tables. I compacted it and it is now much smaller, as
would be expected. This will help greatly.

Now to figure out transactions in Access97... Any good resources on tactics
in using transactions in Access97? :)

Jonathan Scott
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.