Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Forms / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

MDB to SQL

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AG - 12 May 2008 19:03 GMT
I am about to convert a pair of Access 2000 programs from an mdb back end to
SQL Server 2005 back end. I will still be using mdb front ends.
Is there any advantage of converting the front ends to 2003 or even 2007?

Thanks,

Signature

AG
Email: discussATadhdataDOTcom

Albert D. Kallal - 12 May 2008 19:19 GMT
>I am about to convert a pair of Access 2000 programs from an mdb back end
>to SQL Server 2005 back end. I will still be using mdb front ends.
> Is there any advantage of converting the front ends to 2003 or even 2007?
>
> Thanks,

In most of these types of conversions, you wind up leaving the front and as
an mdb. in this type of scenario, there's no advantage to move into 2003 or
later.

it for some reason you choose the route of making an access project (adp),
that in fact there are some advantages as the later versions (2007) will
work correctly with sql server 2005. another words, if you use an access
data project, then you can use the built in query design tools inside of MS
access to design and develop your tables. however, I've always recommended
this approach if you're starting from scratch, or you don't have an existing
application with very much code (sense, if you go to access data project,
you'll have to rewrite all of your dao code).

If you're just going the ODBC link table way, then you can stick with what
you've have since you'll be using the SQL server management tools to build
and set up your tables on the server side.

Signature

Albert D. Kallal    (Access MVP)
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
pleaseNOOSpamKallal@msn.com

AG - 12 May 2008 20:23 GMT
Thanks for the quick reply Albert. I have long found your posts and articles
very helpful.
Yes, the front ends have a great deal of DAO code and quite a few linked
temp tables (which also lets out an ADP). The longest running routines will
be converted to run server side. I am quite comfortable working in SQL
Management Studio.

Signature

AG
Email: discussATadhdataDOTcom

>>I am about to convert a pair of Access 2000 programs from an mdb back end
>>to SQL Server 2005 back end. I will still be using mdb front ends.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> you've have since you'll be using the SQL server management tools to build
> and set up your tables on the server side.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.