Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Developer Toolkits / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

MDB file growing

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim - 04 Feb 2005 19:19 GMT
Hi,  I am new to Access programming.  We recently split our Access database
in two.  Our database is rather large and we are having all kinds of speed
and reliability issues.  I noticed that our front-end database keeps growing
in our production environment.  After running the compress, it is about 6.5
megs.  After the users go at it for a while, it will be somewhere around 145
megs.  Since the data is in a separate database, can anyone explain to me why
I would be seeing this behavior and if this could help explain the problems
we're having with speed?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Immanuel Sibero - 04 Feb 2005 20:21 GMT
Hi Jim,

Is each user running a separate copy of the front end?

Immanuel Sibero

> Hi,  I am new to Access programming.  We recently split our Access database
> in two.  Our database is rather large and we are having all kinds of speed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I would be seeing this behavior and if this could help explain the problems
> we're having with speed?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Jim - 04 Feb 2005 21:05 GMT
Thank you very much for answering...currently, all users (about two dozen or
so) are running the same copy off of a network drive.  It is our intention in
the very near future to start having each user run it off of their own local
copy.

> Hi Jim,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> problems
> > we're having with speed?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Immanuel Sibero - 04 Feb 2005 22:00 GMT
Jim,

Well, I guess you could anticipate my response..  :-)
Two dozens of simultaneous users is a lot. Your front end setup is
documented as one of the more common causes of corruption. I would resolve
this first before looking elsewhere.

Immauel Sibero

> Thank you very much for answering...currently, all users (about two dozen or
> so) are running the same copy off of a network drive.  It is our intention in
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > problems
> > > we're having with speed?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
John Vinson - 05 Feb 2005 00:21 GMT
>It is our intention in
>the very near future to start having each user run it off of their own local
>copy.

I'd edit that from "very near future" to "immediately, without
delay"... <g>

That should solve the bulk of your problem right there.

                 John W. Vinson[MVP]    
Dave - 08 Feb 2005 12:38 GMT
besides the other comments about sharing the fe file, and since you say you
are new to access there are a couple basic things.  Access does not
automatically recover temporarily used space in mdb files.  So when running
queries or other operations that require temporary storage the mdb file
grows but never shrinks.  on the frontend you can set the option to compact
and repair on closing to recover that space, at least as long as it isn't
shared.  for the backend file you are probably best off manually compacting
it on some schedule when no one is using it.

> Hi,  I am new to Access programming.  We recently split our Access database
> in two.  Our database is rather large and we are having all kinds of speed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I would be seeing this behavior and if this could help explain the problems
> we're having with speed?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Bnielsen - 11 Apr 2005 17:29 GMT
This is right along the lines of a problem I'm having with a seemingly
corrupted backend. I've got a split configured application used by a client
of mine. One of the features I've got implemented is periodic backend
compression. When exiting the client, the program checks a date that I have
stored in a table on the backend. If 3 weeks have elapsed between the stored
date and now(), I advise the user that the backend will be compressed. The
program then makes a backup copy of the backend - then compresses it. Every
once in a while, data in tables gets skewed. When adding new records, data
gets plugged into incorrect fields. Does anyone know what causes this and if
there's anything that can be done? Thanks in advance.

Bnielsen

> besides the other comments about sharing the fe file, and since you say you
> are new to access there are a couple basic things.  Access does not
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> problems
> > we're having with speed?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Chris Mills - 15 Apr 2005 05:36 GMT
I don't believe automatic compression is a good idea in ANY circumstances. In
the first place the BE is by definition multi-user, so how do you know
everyone is out? (in any case, it is open by your FE) In the second place, if
it's large it should be done local and not over the network (for reliability
as well). In the third place, it may have subtle corruptions which do not
otherwise prevent it from working. It's a good idea to advise the user, but
leave it at that.

It may well be your case that the BE requires compacting every 3 weeks, OTOH I
have customers who don't unduly complain if the BE is not compressed in a
year!

Chris

> This is right along the lines of a problem I'm having with a seemingly
> corrupted backend. I've got a split configured application used by a client
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Bnielsen
Bnielsen - 29 May 2005 13:36 GMT
Thanks for the note. You're probably right.....3 weeks may be excessive. When
the compression occurs, there are no active tables going on. it happens just
before the app closes. I am going to take your suggestion and just give them
a reminder - and make that every 3-4 months at that. Thanks again.

> I don't believe automatic compression is a good idea in ANY circumstances. In
> the first place the BE is by definition multi-user, so how do you know
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >
> > Bnielsen
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.