Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsFormsForms ProgrammingQueriesModules / DAO / VBAReports / PrintingMacrosDatabase DesignSecurityConversionImporting / LinkingSQL Server / ADPMultiuser / NetworkingReplicationSetup / ConfigurationDeveloper ToolkitsActiveX ControlsNew UsersGeneral 1General 2
Access DirectoryToolsTutorialsUser Groups
Related Topics
SQL ServerOther DB ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

MS Access Forum / Conversion / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Access Conversion back end/frond end

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
barker - 21 Jun 2005 18:26 GMT
I need to have some users be able to update and manipulate database tables
that are still in Access '97 after they are converterd to Acccess 2003.  

Is the only way they can use the Access '97 table via the Splitting of the
front end and back end. .. or can they just convert their database to 2003
and still link to acess '97 tables whereby they may still update in '97
tables ?

Signature

Good Lookin' Out!

Douglas J. Steele - 21 Jun 2005 22:02 GMT
I'm not really sure I understand what subtlety you're trying to make.

How is having a 2003 database linked to the Access 97 tables any different
than splitting into a front-end/back-end?

Realistically, that's your only option: front-ends in both Access 97 and
Access 2003, linked to the back-end in Access 97.

Signature

Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no e-mails, please!)

> I need to have some users be able to update and manipulate database tables
> that are still in Access '97 after they are converterd to Acccess 2003.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and still link to acess '97 tables whereby they may still update in '97
> tables ?
barker - 22 Jun 2005 17:06 GMT
That's what I thought...You are absolutely correct.  I was just making sure I
was not overlooking something.  I guess I was'nt sure if you REALLY need to  
perform a Database Splitter command to have the same functionality.

Thanks so much!
Signature

Good Lookin' Out!

> I'm not really sure I understand what subtlety you're trying to make.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > and still link to acess '97 tables whereby they may still update in '97
> > tables ?
Douglas J. Steele - 22 Jun 2005 22:32 GMT
Well, it's certainly not necessary to use the built-in Database Splitter in
Access. In all the applications I've built, I've never used it once...

Signature

Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no e-mails, please!)

> That's what I thought...You are absolutely correct.  I was just making
> sure I
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> > and still link to acess '97 tables whereby they may still update in '97
>> > tables ?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.